Shintaro Imai vs Tsung-Hao Huang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In a careful analysis of recent second serve performances over the last six months, Imai has edged out a slight advantage, winning 40.9% of points compared to Huang's 38.35%. This statistic is crucial in determining match outcomes, indicating a marginal edge for Imai.

Return game statistics provide further insight into player capabilities. Imai has secured 49.92% of points from their opponent's second serves, while Huang has a slight lead with 50.28%. On the first serve return, Huang outshines Imai with 32.28% compared to Imai's 23.64%, potentially making Huang a stronger contender in head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure situations reveal contrasting performances, with Imai demonstrating superior resilience by saving 59.47% of breakpoints. In contrast, Huang saved 50.42%, suggesting Imai may possess a psychological edge in tight moments and could impact in-game betting predictions.

Examining their records over the past year, Imai has won 58.82% of matches (W/L 30/21), whereas Huang holds a 49.15% win rate (W/L 29/30). This performance data contributes to an overlapped prediction overview, hinting at a slight statistical favoritism towards Imai.

Surface performance is another area of differentiation; Imai has excelled on Clay, boasting an 80% win rate (W/L 4/1), yet shows a lower success rate on Grass. Conversely, Huang's strongest performances have been on Hard courts, with a 56% win rate (W/L 155/124), but less success on Indoor Hard surfaces.

The level of competition faced has varied, with Imai predominantly competing in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K and achieving a 70.27% win rate, whereas Huang has played in similar levels with a 56% success rate. The quality of opponents faced also differs; Imai's opponents had an average rank of 508.33, while Huang's opponents were slightly higher ranked at 396.9.

If this match extends to a deciding set, Huang exhibits superior form with a 55% win rate in all matches played on tour, compared to Imai's 32%. This could influence live match predictions, making Huang a more favorable choice under high-pressure scenarios.

When evaluating current form and event implications for these players, Imai has converted 33.64% of breakpoints recently, lower than Huang's conversion rate of 42.07%. This disparity in breakpoint conversion offers a key indicator for in-game betting predictions.

Weighing all statistical data available, Imai may have a broader match-winning ability; however, Huang demonstrates particular strengths in return games and handling deciding sets, which may tilt the final result in Huang’s favor.